College graduates, Continuing Education, Domestic, For-Profit, Legislation, Minorities, equity, and access, Recruitment, Required, Student Loans, University & College - Written by on Saturday, August 13, 2011 16:09 - 0 Comments

Debate: How to Regulate For-Profit Colleges

photo: flickr user Simon Blackley

by Elbert Chu

 

New York Times hosts an online debate between different perspectives of the for-profit education regulation debate. The comments for the pieces are quite extensive as well and worth a read. Here’s some notable snippets from the debaters:

 

The ‘Pain Funnel’
Jack Conway, attorney general of Kentucky

Recent evidence has uncovered aggressive recruiting tactics designed to pressure students into enrolling, with one investigation indicating that for-profit recruiters are taught a series of questions called the “pain funnel” to entice students into signing. These are the kinds of abuses that attorneys general are uniquely positioned to investigate and stop.

We are especially concerned with potentially deceptive or fraudulent advertising and recruiting tactics. Namely, we are asking four questions about for-profits: Do they accurately represent transferability of credits? Do they adequately inform students that their cost often far exceeds that of public institutions? Do they fraudulently advertise expectations of future employment while hiding default rates? And finally, do they properly respond to complaints?

The Real Outrage
Gaye Tuchman, sociologist, University of Connecticut

Yes, it is pretty terrible that students at for-profit colleges pay back loans at an abysmal rate. But it is more appalling that so few colleges can meet the Education Trust’s basic criteria for maximizing the graduation rates of low-income students.

Rather than worrying about the pay-back rate of loans, our national and state governments should be decreasing costs to attend nonprofit public or private colleges, especially for low-income students and for adults with jobs and family responsibilities. When it comes to college, the poor should not pay proportionally more.

The Rules Don’t Go Far Enough
Osamudia R. James, University of Miami

By civic and economic measures, for-profit higher education outcomes are disappointing. Compared with students of similar socioeconomic and academic profiles at nonprofit institutions, students at for-profit institutions have higher debt burdens, are less likely to graduate, account for disproportionately high numbers of student loan defaults (for which taxpayers are on the hook), reap weaker monetary returns on their education and are less likely to vote or participate in political activities.

Unfairly Singled Out
Harry C. Alford and Lanny J. Davis, National Black Chamber of Commerce

The secretary of education, Arne Duncan, should suspend the carrying out of this rule until Congress can evaluate and carefully review the issue. Congress must step in to create reform that is fair and effective and a remedy for colleges across the board — not just the career college sector.

Playing Favorites
Daniel L Bennett, Center for College Affordability and Productivity

Default rates have risen for all of postsecondary education, as the national cohort default rate increased to 7 percent in 2008 from 4.5 percent in 2003. Yet the majority of institutions have been given a free pass. Recent surveys suggest that students attending all types of institutions have similar expectations: to increase their earning potential. So why should we regulate career and traditional education differently?

 

Check them all out at New York Times.

 



Leave a Reply

Comment

Campus Buzz


We welcome Tips & Pitches



What you need to know weekly:
The WiredAcademic newsletter.


* = required field

Latest WA Original Features






  • Twitter feed loading




Paul Glader, Managing Editor
@paulglader

Eleni Glader, Policy Editor

Elbert Chu, Innovation Editor
@elbertchu

Ravi Kumar, Reporter & Social Media Editor
@ravinepal

Derek Reed, Reporter
@derekreed

Brock Buesing, Contributor










APEI22.95  chart+0.20  chart +0.88%
APOL9.995  chart+0.005  chart +0.05%
AAPL153.61  chart-0.26  chart -0.17%
BPI13.94  chart+0.03  chart +0.22%
CAST0.0025  chart+0.0000  chart +0.00%
CECO9.61  chart-0.05  chart -0.52%
COCO0.0139  chart+0.0000  chart +0.00%
CPLA87.90  chart+0.80  chart +0.92%
DV36.90  chart-0.05  chart -0.14%
EDMC0.0094  chart+0.0009  chart +10.59%
ESI0.358  chart+0.000  chart +0.00%
GOOG971.47  chart+1.93  chart +0.20%
LINC3.39  chart+0.23  chart +7.28%
LOPE77.32  chart-0.57  chart -0.73%
PEDH0.13  chart+0.00  chart +0.00%
PSO8.92  chart+0.01  chart +0.11%
SABA8.81  chart+0.00  chart +0.00%
SCHL42.06  chart+0.21  chart +0.50%
STRA88.86  chart+0.76  chart +0.86%
WPON/A  chart+0  chartN/A
2017-05-26 16:00


Cost of Education, Domestic, Education Quality, Ethics, For-Profit, Regulatory, Required, Students, University & College - Mar 11, 2012 21:17 - 0 Comments

Heard: Senators On Warpath Against For-Profit College Military Push

More In For-Profit


Blended Learning, Domestic, Elementary / Primary / Junior, Flipped Classrooms, High school / Secondary 2, International, Open Source Education, Required, School teachers, Startups, Students, Technology - Mar 12, 2012 19:04 - 0 Comments

Big Weekend For Sal Khan; Appears On 60 Minutes & Launches Free iPad App

More In Technology


Domestic, Education Quality, For-Profit, Friend, Fraud, or Fishy, Required, University & College - Feb 10, 2012 16:36 - 0 Comments

Heard: NYC Warns Against For-Profit Adult Education Scams

More In Friend, Fraud, or Fishy